Home / more articles - The author - Contact on your terms - Feedback - Ask a question - Links - Services

Convincing GraphicHow to be convincing
when you are uncertain

by Matthew Leitch, 16 October 2003



Hidden dangers when you propose an idea
What bosses really think
How to look competent instead of clueless
Toughing it out
Conclusion
Further reading

Hidden dangers when you propose an idea

In your job do you ever have to propose ideas? Most people do occasionally and it's a major part of some jobs. Many of us feel that when we do this we have no option but to pretend to be more certain than we really should be in order to make a strong case for our idea. We talk about the future as if we know what will happen. We gloss over assumptions and make no mention of un-substantiated guesses we are relying on. We take care to look confident that everything will be a success, just as we forecast.

I've done it and I know I'm far from being the only one. Unfortunately, there are two nasty problems with this strategy.

Firstly, we are taking on risks that we really should not take responsibility for. With most good ideas there is an element of uncertainty. That's unavoidable, even with the best management. Why should you take unconditional responsibility for success nobody could guarantee?

Secondly, not talking about uncertainties leads almost inevitably to not thinking about them and not managing them. It can go even further than that. For example, if someone suggests a change to what you propose that would manage risk the instinctive reaction is to fight the change, because to accept it would make you look unsure. The result of failing to manage risk and uncertainty is often failure.

Fortunately, there is an alternative. You can look convincing even when you are uncertain, without the problems of pretending to be certain.

What bosses really think

I recently asked the formidable project management guru, Tom Gilb, what offended him most, uncertainty or its concealment. "Concealment, definitely concealment" he replied. Is there another rational answer? I don't think so and neither do most senior executives.

That's not to say they act in accordance with this belief. Clues from their body language and conversation through to formal management systems like budgeting scream at us that uncertainty is not acceptable. It takes good technique and nerve to avoid the usual trap.

How to look competent instead of clueless

People who are experienced and competent are much better at talking about uncertainties than people who are not. The key to being convincing even when you are talking openly about uncertainties is to say things a bluffer could not. Here are some ideas:

Toughing it out

My personal experience of talking about risks and uncertainties is that people respect genuine expertise. They feel safer with someone who seems to have a true understanding of the situation, provided that person also has sensible actions to propose.

However, sometimes there are awkward moments and some senior managers do not have a rational attitude to uncertainty. How do you cope under that pressure?

Conclusion

The bigger the idea the more important it is to be open about uncertainty and the more patience people have for a professional analysis. But if you're not sure you can trust yourself to carry it off start small and make sure you have a solid technique for when you really need it. The penalties for suppressing uncertainty include failure, loss of credibility, and stress. It's well worth becoming aware of uncertainty suppression and learning not to do it.

Further reading

A related paper on Managed Luck is "How to talk openly about uncertainty at work."

Another interesting read is “Embracing uncertainty: the essence of leadership”, by Phillip G Clampitt, Robert J DeKoch, and M E Sharpe, 2001. The authors have a handy overview of their book, free on the web. Click here. They also have various papers on uncertainty suppression and uncertainty communication on their "Other Publications" page.


About the author: Matthew Leitch is an independent consultant and researcher specialising in internal control and risk management. He is a Chartered Accountant with a degree in psychology whose past career includes software development, marketing, auditing, accounting, and consulting. He spent 7 years as a controls specialist with PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he pioneered new methods for designing internal control systems for large scale business and financial processes, through projects for internationally known clients.

Contact the author at: matthew@managedluck.co.uk

Words © 2003 Matthew Leitch

Home / more articles - The author - Contact on your terms - Feedback - Ask a question - Links - Services

Web-Counter: